Auto insurers blasted for inflating rates with astronomic advertising budgets

Auto insurers blasted for inflating rates with astronomic advertising budgets

Auto insurers blasted for inflating rates with astronomic advertising budgets Every year, insurance companies spend nearly $6 billion to battle it out on the television, radio and every conceivable social media platform. Advertising budgets among the nation’s auto carriers are particularly sizeable and have helped push the insurance industry to the top of the 10 biggest US industries when it comes to growth in ad spending.

Perhaps the best evidence of that advancement is GEICO’s “Push It” ad, which aired during this year’s Super Bowl and broke records for its costliness. According to a Palm Beach Post report, those 30 seconds cost GEICO a whopping $4.5 million – or $150,000 per second.

In general, insurance companies spend so much, they outstrip every other American industry by nearly 8%.

Carriers say keeping their brand fresh in the minds of American consumers is worth the cost, but critics are beginning to voice disapproval. According to J. Robert Hunter of the Consumer Federation of America, the massive ad budgets of auto insurers are a big part of the reason GEICO and Allstate have had to raise rates this year.

“It drives rates up since every penny of the ads is built into the rates,” Hunter – director of insurance for the CFA – said. “Also, lobbying expenses and other such anti-consumer expenses are in the rates in all states except California.”

It’s hard to argue that advertisements don’t take up a significant portion of a carrier’s revenue. According to 2013 SNL Financial report, GEICO spends about $6 of every $100 it collects in premiums on advertising, totaling $1.2 billion annually. Allstate increased its budget last year by 5.7% to reach $900 million, and State Farm pushed its spending up 5.1% to $800 million.

Progressive – now spending more than $600 million a year on the popular “Flo” character – increased its ad spending by 8.6%.
If those rates of increase continue, Hunter argues that even if ad budgets are not currently impacting consumers, they will be soon.

Industry representatives, however, beg to differ.

Robert Hartwig, president of the property/casualty trade group Insurance Information Institute, told the Post that advertising only represents a “tiny slice” of a company’s budget and that accident claims and severe weather are more directly responsible for GEICO and Allstate’s decisions to raise premiums.

“Bob Hunter’s model is that insurance should be offered by a single federal insurer prohibited from spending anything on advertising,” said Hartwig.

According to the SNL Financial report, the top industry advertisers in 2013 were:

1. Berkshire Hathaway: (Geico): $935.1 million
2. Allstate Crop.: $654.8 million
3. State Farm Mutual: $608.1 million
4. Progressive Corp.: $604.2 million
5. Nationwide Mutual: $296.7 million
6. Liberty Mutual: $197.0 million
7. UnitedHealth Group: $193.3 million
8. Farmers Insurance Group: $165.8 million
9. American Family Mutual: $148.7 million
10. United Services Auto Assoc.: $133.0 million
 
8 Comments
  • Jim 6/23/2015 10:05:34 AM
    This is the United States. We have a system in place called capitalism. If an insurer is spending "too much" on ads they will pay the economic price of financial failure. The marketplace is highly competitive. Progressive and GEICO have a business model that works for them, that would not work for carriers like Travelers, who isn't on the big spender list. Mr. Hunter needs to admit that he's made a living seeing faults where they really don't exist. Not too long ago he stated that personal insurance is too expensive because there are many people who can't afford it. Amazing leaps of logic needed to get where he likes to live. Are Progressive and GEICO great companies? Yes . . . and no. Should they be hauled to the woodshed for their advertising expenditures? Only if you're a customer and the way you punish them is by buying from someone else, because their premiums are too high as compared to other companies' premiums for comparable coverage.
    Post a reply
  • Dan Fagan 6/23/2015 10:56:10 AM
    You would think that would make those companies who do not overspend on advertising that much more competitive. I guess you would need to see % of budget as opposed to amount spent.
    Post a reply
  • Jeff Alford 6/23/2015 11:55:57 AM
    Maybe Mr. Hunter could add this to a branch of FEMA, they do such a good job with rates and claims. Maybe the Automobile manufactures could sell cars cheaper if they did not advertise.
    Post a reply